Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Letter to the Editor
Here's my letter which appeared in today's Windsor Star:
Meaghan Martinho's letter comparing the U.S. and Canadian health-care systems is just one more example of how this issue has become one of politics, patriotism and ideology -- all of which are now placed above the actual delivery of health care. If we were to address the issue of how to give Canadians universal access to quality health care, the debate would not centre on whose system is the most flawed. That question is as irrelevant as it is debatable, since only a tiny minority advocates a move to "American-style health care."
If we look to the rest of the developed world, we see that both Canada and the United States are oddballs. In Canada, it's because of our refusal to acknowledge the role of the private sector in delivery of medical services; in the U.S., it's because there is no attempt to provide universal care.
Every other developed nation -- including countries with entrenched social democratic values such as Sweden, France and Germany -- has placed delivery of services above political rhetoric and used private medical care as part of the system that provides quality, universally accessible care to all members of society. In Switzerland, medical insurance is a requirement for all citizens, with government assistance for those who could not otherwise afford it. Both the insurance and the medical care are delivered by the private sector, while the government simply ensures universal access.
As a society, we strive to provide quality medical care for all. But so long as we continue to accept this false choice and fail to look beyond our immediate neighbour, we will fail to achieve that goal.
Monday, April 16, 2007
Your Tax Dollars at Work
Having spent $48 million, no $58 million, wait that should read $68 million on an arena, $75 million to stop the Windsor-Detroit Tunnel falling into private (read evil capitalist pig) hands the city has no turned its attention to the next pressing issue - taxis!
And thank God the city is there to limit the number of providers, what they charge, how old the cars are and what shape the air freshener hanging from the rearview mirror can be. Who knows what might happen if the industry were to provide service based on supply, demand and consumer preference.
Sunday, April 08, 2007
What do Ted Byfield and Gerry Nicholls have in common?
Usually not too much, but this weekend they've both written articles I agree with. Now it's no surprise that I would agree with Gerry, although it is somewhat unusual that he's giving advice to the Liberal Party. Unfortunately for Canada, but fortunately for the Conservative Party, it's not likely the Liberals will take the course Gerry plots out for them.
As for Byfield he chips in with an interesting article in the Calgary Sun about how churches should be trying to increase their membership. I'm a card carrying member of Ted's 75%, but even I might be tempted to attend a sermon of the type he proposes.